The months-long contract wrangling over Dayot Upamecano has left its mark on FC Bayern not only in sporting terms, but also structurally. Behind the scenes, a power play has escalated that exemplifies why conflicts with advisors repeatedly arise at Säbener Straße – and why Bayern are now prepared to show a clear edge
At the center of the latest dispute is Moussa Sissoko, a consultant with a big name and minimal public presence. Known for his aggressive demands, Sissoko recently clashed with PSG boss Nasser Al-Khelaifi – now the next conflict has followed, this time with FC Bayern. Together with a negotiator, he also represents Dayot Upamecano, whose contract expires in the summer
The player’s demands were tough: an annual salary of around 20 million euros, hand money of the same amount and an exit clause of 65 million euros from 2027. Bayern made a lot of concessions to their defender – until their patience ran out. Sporting director Max Eberl, with the backing of the supervisory board, set a clear deadline until the end of the winter transfer window. When there was no response from the advisor, the club withdrew the offer. Only then did Upamecano contact the club personally and signal his willingness to extend his contract. A process that is seen internally as a signal
Bayern tightens the reins – also for economic reasons

As reported by Sport BILD, the record champions have been pursuing a clear goal for months: to reduce salary levels and avoid new financial risks. After years of constantly rising personnel costs, those responsible want to prevent a structural deficit in the annual balance sheet for the first time. This is precisely where the interests of the club and advisors are increasingly colliding
The winter should actually be used to save on salaries and clear out squad positions. Sacha Boey was a clear candidate for sale, including a possible transfer fee and salary savings. Despite receiving offers, the player turned them down and later even parted ways with his team of advisors. Another example is Leon Goretzka: open talks, clear communication, no public drama. Although a transfer would have been possible, the midfielder stayed – neatly coordinated between the club, player and agency
Red lists, good relationships – and old lessons learned
Not every advisor is trusted at Säbener Straße. The name Nedal Huoseh, advisor to Alphonso Davies, is considered problematic internally. Despite a mega contract for the Canadian, high demands and subsequent discussions about contract details caused considerable resentment. In order to avoid an escalation, Bayern are even said to have made concessions to the player once again
The relationship with Harry Kane, who is represented by his brother Charlie, is completely different. The talks are considered to be objective and based on partnership, and a contract extension is firmly planned. There is also calm with super talent Lennart Karl: former national team player Michael Ballack manages the youngster. Perhaps also because Ballack knows from his own experience how quickly deadlines and power games can end at FC Bayern
According to Sport BILD, the Upamecano case marks a turning point. Bayern are no longer prepared to be driven by advisors – even when it comes to top performers. Deadlines, withdrawing offers and clear communication are once again part of the toolkit. The risk of losing stars is consciously accepted. Because internally, nobody is above the club. It is precisely this attitude that causes friction – but could give FC Bayern back more control over its squad and salary structure in the long term.

